Already have an account?  Log In
Monday, February 08, 2010
In the wake of a financial economic crisis, lawmakers and policy analysts have debated the role of federal regulation in the insurance industry. On April 2, Reps. Melissa Bean (D-Ill.) and Ed Royce (R-Ca.) introduced the National Insurance Consumer Protection Act in Congress. This bill would create the option of federal regulation for insurance companies.

Enormous debate has erupted around the idea of optional federal chartering for insurance companies. Groups on both sides of the issue have offered numerous arguments for and against the concept.

Proponents promise a freer, more open market for insurance that would benefit consumers and the economy. Opponents, on the other hand, believe that a new federal regulator will impose burdensome bureaucratic rules, squelch competition, and needlessly increase federal power.

This website provides a free market perspective on the idea of optional federal insurance chartering.
Enormous debate has erupted around the idea of optional federal chartering for insurance companies. Groups on both sides of the issue have offered numerous arguments for and against the concept. Proponents promise a freer, more open market for insurance that would benefit consumers and the economy. Opponents, on the other hand, believe that a new federal regulator will impose burdensome bureaucratic rules, squelch competition, and needlessly increase federal power
Latest News About National Regulatory Modernization
The AIG Effect: AIG Aftermath Spurs State Regulators to Modernize
by: Sean P. Carr
published: Sep 08, 2009
Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner Joel Ario was hiking the Appalachian Trail when he got the news that American International Group Inc. was in danger. More...
Congress Faces Full Plate Of Financial Issues
by: ARTHUR D. POSTAL
published: Sep 04, 2009
Obscured by the intense debate over the shape of healthcare reform legislation, congressmen returning to work Sept. 8 must also deal promptly with the future of the estate tax; otherwise, without congressional action, the levy falls to zero in January before returning to 2001 levels in 2011. More...
White paper: U.S. insurance reform may mirror bad homeland security model
by: Bob Graham
published: Aug 31, 2009
The problems of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security should serve as a cautionary tale a federal takeover of insurance regulation, according to a new white paper. More...
Consumers favor optional federal charter, survey finds
by: Bob Graham
published: Jul 31, 2009
Consumers favor an optional federal charter, according to a consumer advocacy group’s survey, because it would give them the ability to keep their insurance coverage and agent even if they change states. More...
Senate Witnesses See A Role For U.S. Insurance Oversight
by: Arthur D. Postal
published: Jul 29, 2009
WASHINGTON—A consumer group representative and a law professor told a Senate panel that they think the federal government should help regulate the insurance industry. More...
Coalition Letter on Optional Federal Chartering
by: Eli Lehrer
published: Jul 23, 2009
More...
Report: The National Insurance Consumer Protection Act’s Potential Impact on the Social Resiliency of Hazard-Prone Regions
by: Ben Klutsey
published: Jun 23, 2009
This paper discusses the benefits and problems with both the state-based and federal-based regulatory systems and suggests that, if policy makers choose to proceed with an Optional Federal Charter system, they should focus attention on: minimizing political risk, allowing competitive rating, minimizing immediate impact, and maintaining the antitrust exemption. More...
Life insurance groups unite to support optional federal charter
by: Keith L. Martin
published: Jun 19, 2009
Five of the nation’s largest organizations representing the life insurance industry are voicing their support for optional federal insurance regulation to legislators. More...
Relief and Resignation Spread Across Wall Street
by: wsj.com
published: Jun 19, 2009
Tougher Rules and Lower Profits Seen as Unavoidable; Some Comfort Taken in View the Revamp Is 'Free-Market Enough' More...
Can Obama's Plan Unite Insurers?
by: Bill Kenealy
published: Jun 18, 2009
Much as his recent speech in Cairo was widely deemed to have placated historically warring factions, the Obama administration's recent release of a blueprint for re-regulating the financial services industry is drawing plaudits from all sides of the insurance industry. More...
New Paper on Optional Federal Chartering
by: Daniel M. Rothschild
published: Jun 18, 2009
David Marlett has a new working paper discussing how an optional federal charter (OFC) for insurers would impact community resilience to natural disasters. Here’s the abstract: More...
America’s regulatory reforms: Obama’s opening shot
by: The Economist
published: Jun 17, 2009
Barack Obama’s financial overhaul is bold in some parts, timid in others More...
OFC supporters, detractors praise plan for national insurance office
by: Mark A. Hofmann
published: Jun 17, 2009
Both proponents and opponents of an optional federal charter for insurers and producers generally reacted positively to the Obama administration's plan for insurance regulatory reform. More...
Treasury won't pitch new insurance regulations: sources
by: Patrick Rucker and Kevin Drawbaugh
published: Jun 17, 2009
The U.S. Treasury Department will not propose a new regulatory framework for the insurance industry when it outlines sweeping new rules for the financial services sector, sources familiar with the plans said on Tuesday. More...
Obama to merge bank agencies in reform plan-source
by: Kevin Drawbaugh
published: Jun 16, 2009
The Obama administration plans to merge two banking regulators and create a federal watchdog on consumer financial products as part of a sweeping reform plan to be formally unveiled on Wednesday. More...
UPDATE 2-Obama to urge U.S. insurance office, not regulator
by: Kevin Drawbaugh and Patrick Rucker
published: Jun 16, 2009
The Obama administration will call for a new U.S. Treasury Department office on insurance but won't propose federal regulation of the industry in the sweeping financial reform plan it will unveil on Wednesday. More...
Regulatory Plan Would Create New Insurance Office
by: Jessica Holzer and Michael Crittenden
published: Jun 16, 2009
The Obama administration is proposing the creation of a new office within the Treasury Department to coordinate policy in the state-regulated insurance sector, according to a near-final draft of the plan. More...
US Insurers Press Case For Federal Regulation
by: Jessica Holzer
published: Jun 16, 2009
Proponents of creating an optional federal charter for the insurance industry, which is currently regulated by the states, were set to press their case Tuesday before a House panel. More...
US Insurers Press Case For Federal Regulation
by: Wall Street Journal
published: Jun 16, 2009
Proponents of creating an optional federal charter for the insurance industry, which is currently regulated by the states, were set to press their case Tuesday before a House panel. The issue has split the industry, pitting life insurers and large property and casualty insurers against small and medium-sized P&C and mutually-owned companies. More...
Life Insurance Industry: Let Us Choose State Or Federal Regulation
by: Frank Ahrens
published: Jun 09, 2009
As the Obama administration puts the finishing touches on a plan to overhaul financial regulation, the life insurance industry today issued a plea for one of its top priorities: giving insurers the ability to choose whether they are supervised by state or federal regulators, The Post's David Hilzenrath reports. More...
Get Updates Via Email

Get monthly updates about the debate over an Optional Federal Charter.
Sign up Today! ... Click Here
National Regulatory Modernization for Insurers FAQ's
Would the proposals create a big new bureaucracy?
Would these national regulatory proposals increase compliance costs?
Would the creation of a national regulator help incumbent companies make larger profits?
Is an Office of Insurance Information a good idea as a precursor to a national insurance market?
What would the proposed national regulators affect state regulation? What about federalism?
Will states lose tax revenue under an Optional Federal Charter?
Would insurance companies withdraw from certain parts of the country under an OFC?
Would there be a ''race to the bottom''?
Would an OFC subject insurance companies to both federal and state laws, thus increasing the overall burden of regulation?
What is really wrong with the current state system?
Will an OFC help the development of new insurance products?
Is the insurance industry unified in its support of OFC?
Would local insurance agents go out of business under an OFC?
Supporters and opponents of an OFC both cite Illinois as an example of what the market would look like under an OFC. What is the Illinois market like?
What would an OFC do for America’s international competitiveness?
Do other developed countries have something like an OFC?
Would an OFC protect consumers from insurance fraud?
Will it confuse consumers?
Do government-set rates protect consumers?
J. Robert Hunter of the Consumer Federation of America has presented a range of data showing that publicly held insurance companies are relatively safe investments and have become safer in recent years. Does this prove that the insurance industry is reaping more profits than it deserves and should not be rewarded with an Optional Federal Charter?
Does a ''revolving door'' between the industry and regulators prove that the insurance industry and the state regulatory systems are corrupt or that the insurance industry ''owns'' state regulators?
Is an OFC the only way America could liberalize its insurance markets?
What are some alternatives to an OFC?
Resources

You are Visitor #2288483 Since 2007