Already have an account?  Log In
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Florida Doesn’t Deserve a Federal Bailout, Think Tank Says

by: Eli Lehrer and Christian Cámara
published: Feb 10, 2009
State Lawmakers Should Reform Business Regulations First
Washington, D.C., Florida Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty is in Washington, D.C. today lobbying Congress to grant Florida an unlimited line of credit to bail out its Hurricane Catastrophe Fund. The ''Cat Fund'' as it is popularly called, provides subsidized reinsurance – insurance for insurance companies – to primary insurers covering homes and condominiums in Florida.

The fund, which imposes a potential $32 billion liability on the state of Florida, has only $2.8 billion in hard assets and plans to issue bonds to cover other liabilities. Given that no state has ever sold more than $11 billion in bonds all at the same time, however, it appears unlikely that Florida could even come close to paying the Cat Fund's debts.

''Reliance on a Federal bailout as official state policy is reckless at best,'' said Competitive Enterprise Institute Florida Office Director Christian Cámara. ''Instead of lobbying Washington politicians for money, Commissioner McCarty and Governor Charlie Crist should return to Tallahassee and work together with the legislature to restore a healthy, competitive insurance environment to ensure that Florida is able to weather the aftermath of a storm. Taxpayers should not be forced to bailout neither Florida nor the politicians that have placed the state one storm away from economic meltdown.''

''This is a really, really bad idea,'' says CEI Senior Fellow Eli Lehrer who directs' CEI's Washington-based Insurance Project. ''We've already done far too many bailouts of private companies. State governments – particularly ones that make bad decisions – don't need bailouts as well. Congress should say 'No' to Kevin McCarty.''

CEI is a non-profit, non-partisan public policy group dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government. For more information about CEI, please visit our website at www.cei.org.

Contacts:
Eli Lehrer, 202-615-0586
Christian Cámara, 305-608-4300


Get Updates Via Email

Get monthly updates about the debate over an Optional Federal Charter.
Sign up Today! ... Click Here
National Regulatory Modernization for Insurers FAQ's
Would the proposals create a big new bureaucracy?
Would these national regulatory proposals increase compliance costs?
Would the creation of a national regulator help incumbent companies make larger profits?
Is an Office of Insurance Information a good idea as a precursor to a national insurance market?
What would the proposed national regulators affect state regulation? What about federalism?
Will states lose tax revenue under an Optional Federal Charter?
Would insurance companies withdraw from certain parts of the country under an OFC?
Would there be a ''race to the bottom''?
Would an OFC subject insurance companies to both federal and state laws, thus increasing the overall burden of regulation?
What is really wrong with the current state system?
Will an OFC help the development of new insurance products?
Is the insurance industry unified in its support of OFC?
Would local insurance agents go out of business under an OFC?
Supporters and opponents of an OFC both cite Illinois as an example of what the market would look like under an OFC. What is the Illinois market like?
What would an OFC do for America’s international competitiveness?
Do other developed countries have something like an OFC?
Would an OFC protect consumers from insurance fraud?
Will it confuse consumers?
Do government-set rates protect consumers?
J. Robert Hunter of the Consumer Federation of America has presented a range of data showing that publicly held insurance companies are relatively safe investments and have become safer in recent years. Does this prove that the insurance industry is reaping more profits than it deserves and should not be rewarded with an Optional Federal Charter?
Does a ''revolving door'' between the industry and regulators prove that the insurance industry and the state regulatory systems are corrupt or that the insurance industry ''owns'' state regulators?
Is an OFC the only way America could liberalize its insurance markets?
What are some alternatives to an OFC?
Resources

You are Visitor #2295873 Since 2007