Already have an account?  Log In
Tuesday, March 09, 2010
US admin. to brief lobbyists on insurance - sources

by: Reuters
published: Jun 04, 2009
Insurance industry reform will be the chief focus of a briefing scheduled for Thursday evening by Obama administration officials to financial industry lobbyists, said sources familiar with the agenda.
Topics possibly open for discussion include a proposal to establish a U.S. insurance regulator. The nation's more than 6,000 insurers are now regulated largely by state and territorial governments.

The briefing could range further afield, possibly covering other parts of the administration's financial reform agenda, such as establishing a systemic risk regulator and writing new rules for derivatives markets, the sources said.

The insurance industry is still deeply divided on the idea of federal regulation. It is favored by large life insurers and some large property-casualty insurers because they could save money by answering to one regulator instead of more than 50.

Supporters of an optional federal charter for insurers have included Allstate Corp (ALL.N) and other large companies.

But smaller insurers and some other segments of the industry oppose the idea or have not taken a clear position.

Some consumer activists have said federal oversight could bring higher insurance rates and weaker consumer protections.

The Obama administration so far has not made insurance regulatory reform a high priority, although advocates of national oversight have been pushing for it to be included in the administration's ambitious list of objectives. (Reporting by Kevin Drawbaugh; Editing by Leslie Adler)


Get Updates Via Email

Get monthly updates about the debate over an Optional Federal Charter.
Sign up Today! ... Click Here
National Regulatory Modernization for Insurers FAQ's
Would the proposals create a big new bureaucracy?
Would these national regulatory proposals increase compliance costs?
Would the creation of a national regulator help incumbent companies make larger profits?
Is an Office of Insurance Information a good idea as a precursor to a national insurance market?
What would the proposed national regulators affect state regulation? What about federalism?
Will states lose tax revenue under an Optional Federal Charter?
Would insurance companies withdraw from certain parts of the country under an OFC?
Would there be a ''race to the bottom''?
Would an OFC subject insurance companies to both federal and state laws, thus increasing the overall burden of regulation?
What is really wrong with the current state system?
Will an OFC help the development of new insurance products?
Is the insurance industry unified in its support of OFC?
Would local insurance agents go out of business under an OFC?
Supporters and opponents of an OFC both cite Illinois as an example of what the market would look like under an OFC. What is the Illinois market like?
What would an OFC do for America’s international competitiveness?
Do other developed countries have something like an OFC?
Would an OFC protect consumers from insurance fraud?
Will it confuse consumers?
Do government-set rates protect consumers?
J. Robert Hunter of the Consumer Federation of America has presented a range of data showing that publicly held insurance companies are relatively safe investments and have become safer in recent years. Does this prove that the insurance industry is reaping more profits than it deserves and should not be rewarded with an Optional Federal Charter?
Does a ''revolving door'' between the industry and regulators prove that the insurance industry and the state regulatory systems are corrupt or that the insurance industry ''owns'' state regulators?
Is an OFC the only way America could liberalize its insurance markets?
What are some alternatives to an OFC?
Resources

You are Visitor #2295539 Since 2007