Already have an account?  Log In
Saturday, July 04, 2009
Regulating Insurance

by: Marc Racicot
published: Oct 18, 2008
Letter to the Editor RE: Re “Both Sides of the Aisle See More Regulation, and Not Just of Banks” (New York Times news article, Oct. 14)
The entire insurance industry does not believe that the current patchwork system of state regulation is the best way to regulate the industry. In fact, our members would welcome a more focused and efficient regulation of insurance companies at the federal level.
Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. has supported enactment of an optional federal charter for insurance companies that would allow them the option of being regulated at the federal level. He restated his view recently that the current crisis involving American International Group underscores the inadequacies in our current regulatory oversight.

Many in the industry believe it makes a great deal more sense for a federal regulator to monitor systemic risk and exercise groupwide supervision on a national basis to ensure safety and soundness.

Marc Racicot
President
American Insurance Association
Washington, Oct. 14, 2008


Get Updates Via Email

Get monthly updates about the debate over an Optional Federal Charter.
Sign up Today! ... Click Here
National Regulatory Modernization for Insurers FAQ's
Would the proposals create a big new bureaucracy?
Would these national regulatory proposals increase compliance costs?
Would the creation of a national regulator help incumbent companies make larger profits?
Is an Office of Insurance Information a good idea as a precursor to a national insurance market?
What would the proposed national regulators affect state regulation? What about federalism?
Will states lose tax revenue under an Optional Federal Charter?
Would insurance companies withdraw from certain parts of the country under an OFC?
Would there be a ''race to the bottom''?
Would an OFC subject insurance companies to both federal and state laws, thus increasing the overall burden of regulation?
What is really wrong with the current state system?
Will an OFC help the development of new insurance products?
Is the insurance industry unified in its support of OFC?
Would local insurance agents go out of business under an OFC?
Supporters and opponents of an OFC both cite Illinois as an example of what the market would look like under an OFC. What is the Illinois market like?
What would an OFC do for America’s international competitiveness?
Do other developed countries have something like an OFC?
Would an OFC protect consumers from insurance fraud?
Will it confuse consumers?
Do government-set rates protect consumers?
J. Robert Hunter of the Consumer Federation of America has presented a range of data showing that publicly held insurance companies are relatively safe investments and have become safer in recent years. Does this prove that the insurance industry is reaping more profits than it deserves and should not be rewarded with an Optional Federal Charter?
Does a ''revolving door'' between the industry and regulators prove that the insurance industry and the state regulatory systems are corrupt or that the insurance industry ''owns'' state regulators?
Is an OFC the only way America could liberalize its insurance markets?
What are some alternatives to an OFC?
Resources

You are Visitor #2237494 Since 2007