Already have an account?  Log In
Saturday, July 04, 2009
FDIC Chief Bair Says Agency May Expand to Regulate Insurers

published: Oct 29, 2008
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair said the agency may expand to offer protection and regulation for more types of financial institutions, including insurers.
Congress is interested in a federal mechanism to regulate insurers with a U.S. guarantee similar to deposit insurance, she said today at a conference of international deposit insurers in Arlington, Virginia. ''That might be a direction where our abilities would be expanded,'' Bair said.
Bair, whose Washington-based agency insures deposits at U.S. banks, has won praise from lawmakers including House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank for helping to accelerate modification of troubled mortgages.

Some of the largest U.S. insurers have pushed for federal oversight to replace regulation provided by the 50 states. The so-called ''optional federal charter'' would give insurers a choice between a national or state overseer to monitor their ability to pay claims.


Get Updates Via Email

Get monthly updates about the debate over an Optional Federal Charter.
Sign up Today! ... Click Here
National Regulatory Modernization for Insurers FAQ's
Would the proposals create a big new bureaucracy?
Would these national regulatory proposals increase compliance costs?
Would the creation of a national regulator help incumbent companies make larger profits?
Is an Office of Insurance Information a good idea as a precursor to a national insurance market?
What would the proposed national regulators affect state regulation? What about federalism?
Will states lose tax revenue under an Optional Federal Charter?
Would insurance companies withdraw from certain parts of the country under an OFC?
Would there be a ''race to the bottom''?
Would an OFC subject insurance companies to both federal and state laws, thus increasing the overall burden of regulation?
What is really wrong with the current state system?
Will an OFC help the development of new insurance products?
Is the insurance industry unified in its support of OFC?
Would local insurance agents go out of business under an OFC?
Supporters and opponents of an OFC both cite Illinois as an example of what the market would look like under an OFC. What is the Illinois market like?
What would an OFC do for America’s international competitiveness?
Do other developed countries have something like an OFC?
Would an OFC protect consumers from insurance fraud?
Will it confuse consumers?
Do government-set rates protect consumers?
J. Robert Hunter of the Consumer Federation of America has presented a range of data showing that publicly held insurance companies are relatively safe investments and have become safer in recent years. Does this prove that the insurance industry is reaping more profits than it deserves and should not be rewarded with an Optional Federal Charter?
Does a ''revolving door'' between the industry and regulators prove that the insurance industry and the state regulatory systems are corrupt or that the insurance industry ''owns'' state regulators?
Is an OFC the only way America could liberalize its insurance markets?
What are some alternatives to an OFC?
Resources

You are Visitor #2237496 Since 2007