Already have an account?  Log In
Thursday, March 11, 2010
North Dakota Insurance Commissioner Race Down to the Wire

by: Midwest News
published: Nov 04, 2008
The race for the commissioner's spot in North Dakota has been a lively exchange from the beginning. Incumbent Adam Hamm, a Republican, is running for his first four-year term as insurance commissioner. He was appointed by the Governor Hoeven earlier this year to replace Jim Poolman who resigned 17 months early to launch his own business.
Insurance Journal did an indepth interview with Commissioner Hamm during the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' meeting in late September. At that time he said he is a staunch supporter of state regulation of insurance and cited the AIG and economic failures as proof state insurance regulation is effective because the insurance sector of AIG remained solvent. He opposed to the optional federal charter version of federal oversight of insurance, which he says is most strongly supported on the life side of the industry.
Hamm also believes his top priorities to be the protection of consumers and continued competitiveness of insurance companies in the North Dakota market. He has proposed graduated drivers licensing for teen drivers.

Hamm's Democratic opponent, Fargo state Rep. Jasper Schneider, jumped into the election early on accusing Hamm of using a senior citizen television public service announcement paid for by department funds and featuring Hamm as an inappropiate use of department resources. Schneider also said that Hamm's proposal to crack down and toughen restrictions for teen drivers was just another ploy to win over voters saying that the proposal came just two weeks before the election.

Schneider's own proposal is a push to bar any state insurance commissioner who resigns from the job voluntarily from working in the insurance industry. Schneider said 35 states have so-called ''revolving door'' legislation, including Montana and South Dakota. Violating the South Dakota law is a Class 1 misdemeanor, with a maximum penalty of one year in prison and a $1,000 fine.ustry for one year afterward. He plans to file the bill draft in December.


Get Updates Via Email

Get monthly updates about the debate over an Optional Federal Charter.
Sign up Today! ... Click Here
National Regulatory Modernization for Insurers FAQ's
Would the proposals create a big new bureaucracy?
Would these national regulatory proposals increase compliance costs?
Would the creation of a national regulator help incumbent companies make larger profits?
Is an Office of Insurance Information a good idea as a precursor to a national insurance market?
What would the proposed national regulators affect state regulation? What about federalism?
Will states lose tax revenue under an Optional Federal Charter?
Would insurance companies withdraw from certain parts of the country under an OFC?
Would there be a ''race to the bottom''?
Would an OFC subject insurance companies to both federal and state laws, thus increasing the overall burden of regulation?
What is really wrong with the current state system?
Will an OFC help the development of new insurance products?
Is the insurance industry unified in its support of OFC?
Would local insurance agents go out of business under an OFC?
Supporters and opponents of an OFC both cite Illinois as an example of what the market would look like under an OFC. What is the Illinois market like?
What would an OFC do for America’s international competitiveness?
Do other developed countries have something like an OFC?
Would an OFC protect consumers from insurance fraud?
Will it confuse consumers?
Do government-set rates protect consumers?
J. Robert Hunter of the Consumer Federation of America has presented a range of data showing that publicly held insurance companies are relatively safe investments and have become safer in recent years. Does this prove that the insurance industry is reaping more profits than it deserves and should not be rewarded with an Optional Federal Charter?
Does a ''revolving door'' between the industry and regulators prove that the insurance industry and the state regulatory systems are corrupt or that the insurance industry ''owns'' state regulators?
Is an OFC the only way America could liberalize its insurance markets?
What are some alternatives to an OFC?
Resources

You are Visitor #2295862 Since 2007